Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Justisaur <justisaur@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: What Have You Been Playing... IN JANUARY 2025?
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 20:21:39 -0800
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <8a99daf003b707044e3b2b84359fd099b4f50f65@i2pn2.org>
References: <lrhspjltqo8598jqtg9u3gqsq3dqlu0ii5@4ax.com>
 <dda3b92dfee697582541f871094c63fcbff4472f@i2pn2.org>
 <0bgvpj9of6c2hmiqkmqrnvejgjv4tmvk1s@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 04:21:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2431623"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="Qhe2PUx7m0g9bYSXAivnRF/BNu0vlRR08ycHrj9WPKg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <0bgvpj9of6c2hmiqkmqrnvejgjv4tmvk1s@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1979
Lines: 25

On 2/2/2025 11:14 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

> (oh, and with regards to movies, Star Trek Section 13 is as bad as
> everyone is telling you. I can honestly say I enjoyed "Borderlands'
> more... and that's saying something. It's not just a bad Star Trek
> movie, it's just a bad movie all around; terrible cinematography,
> awful story, tedious pacing, unexciting sets and set-pieces. As some
> wag wrote, the only good thing you can say about Section 13 is that it
> finally put to rest the question about which is the worst Star Trek
> movie. ;-)

Oof, It's 31 I guess, but 13 makes sense.  Seems to be a spin off of 
Discovery which I've watched most of (maybe all of) and actually liked. 
The Empress is not really a beloved character to me though.

19-16% on RT that's very very poor ratings.

-- 
-Justisaur

  ø-ø
(\_/)\
  `-'\ `--.___,
   ¶¬'\( ,_.-'
        \\
        ^'