Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop Date: 9 Jan 2025 00:56:35 GMT Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <1818649790e0bb2f$109336$891815$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net tfO5bq/DbmfCtabaB3rXjgMn0tX9XDkruzFvzd5t7hNkvoj46J Cancel-Lock: sha1:+strv3AywVdAJagK8jWa35qf5Gs= sha256:I73+Q83sctkCLZjkhSxTX3Ne9mbDcCkoh3sM3GTcojc= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 2439 On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:43:15 +0000, Farley Flud wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:11:00 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > > >> Linux, by now, should've been and become "really appropriate" for the >> unwashed masses. >> >> > Nope. GNU/Linux is not a single organized entity. It is a disjoint > collection of volunteer activity that remarkably, due to its Unix > foundation, holds together quite well. > > However, the ongoing problem is the reluctance of hardware manufacturers > either to supply GNU/Linux drivers or to provide open specs for > volunteer developers. For this reluctance, GNU/Linux cannot be blamed. > > The GNU/Linux user must always be willing to do the preliminary > compatibility research or else he may be unsatisfied. > > GNU/Linux never was intended for the unwashed masses and never will be > for the unwashed masses. Success in this area would actually mean the > destruction of GNU/Linux as a superior OS. Did you make some sort of New Years resolution about posting well-stated observations rather than the usual insults? Please keep up the good work.