Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: How can gravity itself escape a black =?UTF-8?B?aG9sZT8=?=
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 18:27:29 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <28139f64603e3f8fa65acee77894d25c@www.novabbs.com>
References: <0c2d15b56c8574a409160470daacd2aa@www.novabbs.com> <67245699.7E0@ix.netcom.com> <69b218714bad6ce079ec190277a8f310@www.novabbs.com> <0d3a4391-7167-b0a4-c1d6-b0d4ec74fc08@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <97dfb8e00846bea7e0b4b2b75bb47330@www.novabbs.com> <1803dbfe8d933bdb$48683$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <36ad461db86e3be2e5f718b8acfd57ce@www.novabbs.com> <1803eef29fa0d3de$57533$990713$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <392be6fbe6f7c218e56283abede5aef8@www.novabbs.com> <180415cdbcf7f47c$439028$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3ff2defde254df16c2755d8cf08b77f4@www.novabbs.com> <1804348e1ae47137$420401$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="635466"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$g/kE1VjWnqhTneAGOqPAeOnDPknO0VRgS7680zRGjFCjeWxUtiwSa
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35
Bytes: 2654
Lines: 33

On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 16:45:42 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> And Harnagel is still slandering.
> Nothing unexpected from a piece
> of relativistic shit.

Wozniak so easily "slanders" others:

"That's just the effect of taking the inconsistent
mumble of an insane idiot"

But he is SO offended when he is taken to task.  It's called
"hypocrisy" and Wozniak is a big-time hypocrite.

> Linear motion is linear and circular
> motion is circular.

Those are tautologies, which says nothing at all.  This
is typical Wozzie's vacuous mind.  He believes that
saying A = A and B = B gives him some right to demand
an answer.  It doesn't, he really needs to come up with
B = f(A) or A = g(B), but he isn't competent to be able
to do that.

> So, is your mass frozen for such
> observer or not? No answer? Sure.
> Slandering is easy, answerring
> questions is not, right, poor trash?

"It is not time yet for you to know what I see. When that
time comes, then you will know." – Akiane Kramarik

Perhaps Wozniak must first stop lying and admit that "time"
is much more than a human invention:-)