Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: The problem with not owning the software Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:23:47 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <1r5nn2k.7m1rupwur1c6N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 09:23:47 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dd68e398adb81eafeb0e0c2acd12f764"; logging-data="1620352"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+E55Bz1SIQJegufZGBz/6Vu5tJ8BPYvJw=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8r6hlbse6hEZwLlfnpjwkm3gehY= sha1:6Mmi3JRUsddzgFD2TRc1U67J0a8= Bytes: 2837 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:07:15 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote: > >> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> That adds Linux-style package-manager functionality that is missing >>> from macOS. Because without it, trying to install open-source >>> software turns into a complete nightmare. >> >> Have been using OSS on Mac for 15+ years, including building packages >> from source. Far, far easier than on Windows. > > That kind of thing doesn’t scale without a package manager, though. How > many hundred open-source packages were you able to build and install at > once? My point is that most OSS software that users need are available as ready-to-use downloads. There's no ubiquitous need for linux-like package manager on macOS. Useful? Probably. Necessary? Nope. Asking users to do a "brew install firefox" is a non-starter.