Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Any bike facility is a good bike facility?
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 12:12:59 -0600
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <vmrcfa$14mh4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vmr8ej$13k90$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:13:00 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e8223dccc8f0a8397ad3ff90992a1a05";
	logging-data="1202724"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19+8WX8SNd1KMNWngjbS+hI"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CXHHTF5ibs8OGfMeMkwUBVpwWDU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vmr8ej$13k90$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1422

On 1/22/2025 11:04 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
> Worst bike lanes:
> 
> https://discerningcyclist.com/worst-bike-lanes/
> 
> One problem with such a list is that for some people, it 
> lowers the standard for approval. That is, some will say 
> "Well, at least the **** they built  here isn't _that_ bad."
> 

Thanks! Brightened  my day.

-- 
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971