Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: bike path news
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:56:34 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <phh6tj1vhn9td6o5qj22o8vevs9thi9j8t@4ax.com>
References: <vqla8n$1018u$1@dont-email.me> <m37mnjFnuacU1@mid.individual.net> <vqn01k$1die7$1@dont-email.me> <vqnbib$1fvjp$1@dont-email.me> <vqns6i$1jg04$2@dont-email.me> <vqnv2t$1k5ti$1@dont-email.me> <m3ah8oF6b83U1@mid.individual.net> <aq40tjd2j1lshglirpacplbq1fo09dd9do@4ax.com> <vqpfhc$205pd$1@dont-email.me> <9al1tj92s3equc5tco4flk66m5gmpb9lom@4ax.com> <vqreci$2g021$3@dont-email.me> <04l2tjhf9149ddu8893b2tioaj789ad1ec@4ax.com> <vqsfln$2n6vl$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 21:56:39 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d32fb108e5513afd5392a7a9e3f4a2d4";
	logging-data="4099913"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DnixLpHJdVXUgjKuN44hxqa1TgdTzog0="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:54RD/vQ3xoNhk9mJjHIDSE0AWL0=
Bytes: 2329

On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 13:18:46 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>On 3/12/2025 5:31 AM, John B. wrote:
>> 
>> But again, it is legal and even recommended by at least one high level
>> police officer. Who are you, or Frankie, for that matter, to deny some
>> one the right to do something that is lawful to do?
>
><sigh> John, you're among those who seem to forget this is a 
>_discussion_ group.
>
>I'm not denying our timid friend's right to carry his security gun with 
>him, any more than I'm denying someone's right to carry a security 
>blanket or security teddy bear. After all, the motivation is the same 
>for all three, and all three are generally lawful.
>
>But "lawful" is not the same as "smart" or "wise." In this case, I think 
>it's foolish; and we are allowed to discuss such foolishness.
>
>Why would you deny us the right to discuss it?

Why won't you discuss the reasons why you brag?

--
C'est bon
Soloman