Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:55:37 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vrepdo$161nt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vr1hig$5qt$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr29g3$23fi7$3@dont-email.me> <vr2d3k$jli$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr3fbu$1gbs1$3@solani.org> <vr3pvd$20r1$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr4cgl$3qbcs$3@dont-email.me> <vr6fgl$1uok$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr6tit$21dt9$1@dont-email.me> <vr71ea$qjf$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr774e$2a6rj$2@dont-email.me> <vr7b30$qjf$2@news.muc.de>
 <vr7jql$2jj8r$4@dont-email.me> <vr92l8$1pc1$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr9gla$bvhh$1@dont-email.me> <vrbn3b$2d16$1@news.muc.de>
 <vrc3ps$2og7j$1@dont-email.me> <vrc64d$219n$1@news.muc.de>
 <vrc70k$2og7j$5@dont-email.me>
 <d7b52b84106c40422c61dd52c60177d859a2f701@i2pn2.org>
 <vrebc5$pg11$2@dont-email.me> <vreeg5$sqmv$1@dont-email.me>
 <vreihc$10425$2@dont-email.me> <vreoon$15qne$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:55:37 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6f9f26c81ac23d253c44dec1578e707c";
	logging-data="1246973"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19kDcvvwltPosABNVFUga86qGKhVJ9JhhQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:00uP5yKf1bpChsB9iGcOoF3iJdo=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vreoon$15qne$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2517

On 19.03.2025 16:44, FromTheRafters wrote:
> WM wrote on 3/19/2025 :
>> On 19.03.2025 13:49, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> WM presented the following explanation :
>>
>>>> Obviously the subtraction of the set of all FISONs which as single 
>>>> FISONs cannot empty ℕ cannot empty ℕ.
>>>
>>> Do you believe that the naturals having been extracted from the 
>>> infinite set, leaves the still infinite set devoid of naturals?
>>
>> I don't believe but have proven: UF = ℕ  ==> Ø = ℕ.
>> FISONs cannit empty ℕ.
> 
> Can you answer the question anyway, without the delusions?

Obviously the subtraction of the set of all FISONs which as single
FISONs cannot empty Cantor's ℕ cannot empty Cantor's ℕ.

Regards, WM