Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:50:09 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <vrj5nh$12273$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vr3pvd$20r1$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr4cgl$3qbcs$3@dont-email.me> <vr6fgl$1uok$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr6tit$21dt9$1@dont-email.me> <0dcd52f8-c0ca-4e41-bb47-3a4e689f103e@att.net>
 <vr75vb$2a6rk$1@dont-email.me> <c60b35cb-33a8-40a7-ad7a-4c5841a6f454@att.net>
 <vr78ng$2a6rj$3@dont-email.me> <578344c0-4d58-4dcb-8a89-988e3e60f9d7@att.net>
 <vr7ivf$2jj8r$3@dont-email.me> <3a9f34ab-c270-4dfc-b23c-14741b68875b@att.net>
 <vr8a53$3dsos$1@dont-email.me> <3af4ba5e-63c6-4145-966c-67c832e127bc@att.net>
 <vr9him$bvhg$1@dont-email.me> <fc1d5825-1d93-4ac8-a6e4-e513cfce213a@att.net>
 <vrbcnf$23ker$2@dont-email.me> <ae5edd89-d5da-4ff4-a723-485cafa92582@att.net>
 <vrc8n0$2og7i$2@dont-email.me> <0b8644b2-7027-420e-b187-8214daaf9e3b@att.net>
 <vrf5bp$1gcun$1@dont-email.me> <b3730bf7-bcd1-4698-b465-6d6ef190b29d@att.net>
 <vrgm1k$2s8c6$2@dont-email.me> <c81100d7-9354-4c8e-b216-e147cab9b41c@att.net>
 <vrhrlb$3ta8t$1@dont-email.me> <c0de7504-7d17-42f1-83e8-8767c0859c0c@att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:50:10 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="05800b89d103ce6835834fcc839dfa75";
	logging-data="1116387"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Rhd3+C2XWS3MdtDwYV4jUVx2Nd6TCK+8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FlCqRMVWnoLF7xRJET09iF9ffps=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <c0de7504-7d17-42f1-83e8-8767c0859c0c@att.net>
Bytes: 2632

On 20.03.2025 23:25, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 3/20/2025 3:52 PM, WM wrote:
On 20.03.2025 23:25, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 3/20/2025 3:52 PM, WM wrote:

> For sets not.having a WM.size,
> Bob vanishing isn't a size.change.

Only if reducing isn't reducing.

> Our sets do not change.

Only if changing isn't changing.

>> But you claim that
>> the set of O's shrinks from infinity to empty.
> 
> I claim that
> the set of X's and O's is the same size as
> the set of X's,

That leads to losses in lossless exchanges and therefore is incompatible 
with mathematics and with that logic which mathematics is based upon.

Regards, WM