Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!ereborbbs.duckdns.org!.POSTED.192.168.18.6!not-for-mail From: Kyonshi Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo Subject: Re: Humans - "bipedal animals"? Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 00:53:56 +0200 Organization: Erebor InterNetNews Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: c3066ed76bae8bcc0e476efb157ff758 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 22:53:55 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: ereborbbs.duckdns.org; posting-host="192.168.18.6"; logging-data="12076"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ereborbbs.duckdns.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1528 Lines: 9 On 10/14/2024 8:50 AM, Mario Petrinovic wrote: >         Are we really that much more bipedal than other animals? No, we > aren't. What distinguishes us from others is that we *cannot* be > quadrupedal, this is our characteristic, we cannot be quadrupedal. > https://youtube.com/shorts/NLk9neGyheM?si=DzVuMfP8D7igswHB >         Did we become "bipedal" so that we can look over the grass? No, > this doesn't make you "bipedal": > https://youtube.com/shorts/qiXw5_JD59g?si=97nQkAepJh3iac5S kangaroos are also bipedal