Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: programmable circuit breaker Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:22:21 +0000 Organization: Poppy Records Lines: 18 Message-ID: <1r8qd8p.mnjwxl1wppgcaN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> References: <11qgsj5aunaunmdaiakbla0im6jfd0l1tu@4ax.com> X-Trace: individual.net 1k1jGwumr74wTK7of/QVmwIW38btRmkJFHf94DlomLNCn2HK2d X-Orig-Path: liz Cancel-Lock: sha1:TDySe44lySfg0VKpq0K7IIPPnB4= sha256:VfsQTBX6M7Q0LY/oh3Im+WElPHJV4oOsl7Ufz5Yb0aU= User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4.6 Bytes: 1510 john larkin wrote: [...] > Maybe I shouldn't diode clamp the relay coils. I'll have to test the > dropout time. Put a resistor in series with the clamp diode, the value can be chosen to keep the inductive spike just below the maximum allowable voltage and that will give the fastest turn-off. By using higher voltage switching transistors you can have a higher voltage spike and a faster turn-off - but there is the risk that the spike might be capacitively coupled to somewhere vulnerable to damage. -- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk