Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: The problem with not owning the software Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 22:03:23 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <9OCcnRW7grqkbPT6nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@earthlink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2025 23:03:23 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dfb272dfd2cca03af0095fb52a6ec097"; logging-data="3116226"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+DtaIasf5ExijN+0zVqRxg" User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:b5J3mz1d6RnPBOVKnxA8H23FEr8= Bytes: 2725 On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 14:50:25 -0500, DFS wrote: > On 1/1/2025 2:31 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 16:45:04 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote: >> >>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:25:01 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'd bet a decent python script would do it in minutes, with a tiny >>>>> footprint and be reliable. >>>> >>>> Even Microsoft realizes that now. >>> >>> I presume you're referring to excel now including a python >>> interpreter. I don't think it's much of an improvement. >> >> Obviously Microsoft is expecting its users to think otherwise. And it >> wants to charge them for the privilege, so it must be expecting them to >> believe it’s an improvement worth paying extra money for. >> >> So either Python is that much better than VBA, or VBA is that much >> worse than Python. Take your pick. ;) > > Python in Excel costs NOTHING. > > https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/python-in-excel#pricing-plans Read the fine print.