Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: DFS Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: The problem with not owning the software Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 13:59:37 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <9OCcnRW7grqkbPT6nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@earthlink.com> <6779778d$0$28051$426a34cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 19:59:36 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="02af9e685f7e6d0afa56e47368ee12c4"; logging-data="628504"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/IypUMk2OKEd9twoPtunXS" User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mqsA6HrHzJNaYmCVX3cYWLODK0I= In-Reply-To: <6779778d$0$28051$426a34cc@news.free.fr> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2698 On 1/4/2025 1:01 PM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Le 04-01-2025, DFS a écrit : >> >> Which Linux distro offers perfect consistency? > > First, I'd say it's not the job of the distro. It's the job of the > Window Manager. > > Now, the first time I installed Mint for someone else, I installed a few > different WM to show that there is no better WM, there is only a WM > which suit more the user. And they have to be tested to know which one > to chose. I have to say it was disturbing to see they all look similar > and I still don't know if I like it or not. > > So, Mint is not perfect, but it's the only one I know which offer real > consistency. Cinnamon desktop?