Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Edward Rawde" Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: half and full bridge chips Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:28:45 -0400 Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:28:47 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com; logging-data="34941"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com" Cancel-Lock: sha1:OorKQmmYmCkrBw08BTZEi94v4qk= sha256:ccbM1mDLtSJO03WMNjtGdR1Z+WQY4dKB0mdbDyVJkfM= sha1:nQbQMLmao5Wya1xab18F/xBT2lE= sha256:OvxZQpXKHVF839+EAV8UKh+Dyw4HCE++fwHZ30od//w= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 Bytes: 2461 "john larkin" wrote in message news:l3s5tjtkiu5mgf88ro6340cqtogi14nelg@4ax.com... > I'm designing some products that need 48-volt half or full-bridge > drivers. Not just gate drivers but the whole thing. > > We tried the TI DRV8962. It has lots of voltage and current range and > has four half bridges, but its shoot-through power dissipation is high > and limits its frequency to about 200 KHz. > > We found the STSPIN958. "Maximum output current up to 5 Arms"? Has to be a misspelling of Amps I thought. But table 2.1 does imply Amps rms. It's been a while since I used Si9978. No surprise it's obsolete now. > What a goofy part number. One of my software > guys wants to play with hardware so we got two eval boards, assuming > he'd blow one up learning. His rig is a nightmare and he's shorted all > sorts of things but it won't blow up. It looks really nice and could > be an audio amp or a servo driver or a TEC driver. It's rated for 500 > KHz but he ran it at 1 MHz and it just gets a bit warmer. > > The slew rate control and adjustable current limit are slick. > > The data sheet is horrible and the eval board is very weird. > > Why do some europeans put their data sheets in strange order, like the > table of contents somewhere near the end? >