Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cursitor Doom Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: BAW Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 17:59:47 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:59:50 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b079657607eb2cbd8bfce0205ca8934d"; logging-data="1200735"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6d6S5gSPLb/lXQRfFNrCdmQmG/5autLk=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:bI7HaBAonF2Vams7BxvzElKMybM= Bytes: 1665 On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:26:10 -0800, john larkin wrote: >On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:52:03 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs > wrote: > >>john larkin wrote: >>> https://www.ti.com/product/CDC6C >>> >>> These are like 35 cents at 1K. >>> >>> >> >>Of course a crystal oscillator is a BAW device too. ;) >> >>Cheers >> >>Phil Hobbs > >Don't get technical with me! > >I wonder if it's all silicon, a sort of bulk MEMS thing. The price is >absurd. I guess every one has to be trimmed to frequency. When they quote jitter at 0.1ps, does that translate to phase noise?