Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: The lost key Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 08:35:09 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <20250331mo131610@o15.ybtra.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 09:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="36cff22e2bbce90c63e390e25cbe9050"; logging-data="3066925"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wstPY6emr0GfhzJhwtpTZKurFfGw2iq0c9B3zsVtIfA==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:zvEFbm5LH1WBL+Oet89eukYdGBk= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2098 On 04/04/2025 07:54, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > The lost key makes me think of brute forcing SCOS. You remind me of a general --- always ready to fight the last war. From the OP: "I lost my key, so it's not locked." Clearly, if it's not locked there isn't a key (because it's lost), so what precisely are you going to brute force? -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within