Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:52:56 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 19:52:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1828f0118e79cc8b1a7f2c640bd525fe"; logging-data="3764430"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BcB3VTTOYfIn8GaBZlaqnEZCZwgOg59E=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:F6XuACJfFjhLL0tCTKcixMf+3rs= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1606 On 4/1/2025 1:42 PM, Dan Cross wrote: > In article , > Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> He looks at size 6.2 -> 7.2 -> 8.2 -> 9.2 and .mar vs .c 6.2 -> 9.2. >> >> https://vmssoftware.com/resources/blog/2025-03-31-how-big-is-vms/ > > Wow. That's a lot smaller than I had expected. It must be some of the bigger ones. 409/15 * 1.9 MLOC would be over 50 MLOC, which is way too high, so "representative of identifiable components of the system" must have skewed selection towards bigger ones. Arne