Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: The lost key Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 01:51:56 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <20250331mo131610@o15.ybtra.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 10:51:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e2c747021cf4b98cdbf0e00a9e01b7cd"; logging-data="3222936"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MDdxku+Ta9wsZSg8K3E4JTJVkSxBVmQo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:37LYcPcQ9Uv3eg80vX5rt05OwEw= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2131 On 4/4/2025 12:35 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 04/04/2025 07:54, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > > >> The lost key makes me think of brute forcing SCOS. > > You remind me of a general --- always ready to fight the last war. > > From the OP: "I lost my key, so it's not locked." > > Clearly, if it's not locked there isn't a key (because it's lost), so > what precisely are you going to brute force? > Don't tell me the ciphertext _is_ the plaintext? ;^o