Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix6.panix.com!nan.users.panix.com!robomod!not-for-mail
From: D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com>
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals
Subject: Re: 3rd RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:53:23 EDT
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Approved: NGP Approval Key <ngp-approval-key@ngp.big-8.org>
Message-ID: <vr1src$1rj2d$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqq7tf$ehn$1@reader1.panix.com> <vqtir0$2ukis$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqujqc$bid$1@reader1.panix.com> <vquse4$3d1t6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vr1b28$at4$1@reader1.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix6.panix.com:166.84.1.6";
	logging-data="19512"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:A/1GuuaBn5A/S3NiyB07CFc09Rk=
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to              ngp@nan.users.panix.com
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical/policy queries to ngp-admin@nan.users.panix.com
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP <https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/stump>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: DE DE DE
X-Spam-DCC: www.nova53.net: mailcrunch1.panix.com 1206; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Authentication-Results: mail2.panix.com; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=macgui.com
Authentication-Results: mail2.panix.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=eternal-september.org
Authentication-Results: name/B75B2622AC; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=macgui.com
X-Original-Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 19:34:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+hj33R7guxgsdFRI8snoOwFQCjSGnSWjw=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Auth: PGPMoose V2.0 PGP news.groups.proposals
 iEYEARECAAYFAmfUeyMACgkQrPkQbuk9hds8ogCgjBEeRXloPmC5SmamhHx25/ys
 EiUAoJ7aPC3Mq1nvk84AUhr2gfJRMzVW
 =LfLF
Bytes: 2447
Lines: 12

On 3/14/25 10:16 AM, Paul W. Schleck wrote:
>
> 
> Such a service would realistically have to employ monitoring/alerting,
> SPAM filtering, keyword trapping, duplicate detection, rate limiting,
> and manual review of any queued articles for false positives. This is
> starting to resemble the duties of a human moderator, and a significant
> workload for one volunteer long-term.
>

Are you volunteering to run the robo-moderator?