Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11 Subject: Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 09:31:05 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <1830f15ad744a064$76635$735129$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 13:31:08 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="005bd6b5c5ffeba1d2738dc40c9ac34d"; logging-data="2896592"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++vsubyjd9RefWWOI9etMu3A7gZv56FMs=" User-Agent: Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Thg99Gxs14GwVawnZoA60TzDN18= In-Reply-To: <1830f15ad744a064$76635$735129$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2184 On Fri, 3/28/2025 6:40 AM, Farley Flud wrote: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:20:00 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> >> NTFS is certainly showing its age. But it’s not clear that ReFS is >> really enough to take Windows forward. >> > > Whatever the case, it will be another proprietary format that GNU/Linux > cannot (easily) access. > > IIRC, it tooks many years befor GNU/Linux was able to correctly access > and write NTFS files. > > I still would not trust the Linux kernel module for writing NTFS even > though it is regarded to be stable and free from error. > > In the not-so-rare times that I must interchange files between Winblows > and GNU/Linux I will use either VFAT or EXFAT format. Paragon is offering a Linux driver for ReFS. Even though the ReFS has no public spec for it. I whipped up a quick test. [Picture] https://i.postimg.cc/bNfxLZpS/Re-FS-On-W11-Insider.gif I don't think anything has changed. Partition shrink is not offered (in Windows File Explorer). Paul