Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10 Subject: Re: Cult of Unix Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 00:54:19 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <1VcgP.54962$XfF8.39289@fx04.iad> <6h1bojt7kdp4d5euq0f78rtuvqpg7edc3e@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 01:54:20 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce4d85e5abc66742c04baa3be9b45efd"; logging-data="1339500"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19o+IJpY9jQVsi1Zz4xbNea" User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IigO3GKn/gtOMqGwW28EsfdsmCo= Bytes: 2451 On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 20:53:08 -0500, Paul wrote: > On Fri, 1/17/2025 6:55 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> Windows seems to force you into thinking in terms of sector-level >> copies and low-level “imaging” and like that. Filesystems are supposed >> to abstract away from all that. They do on Linux, but it seems Windows >> hasn’t quite caught up to that idea yet. >> > No, you just gotta use your brain. That is all. > > Who in their right mind, picks the least efficient way to do something ? Nobody did. They picked the only way that would actually work, and that was to give up on Windows, and boot up a Linux system to access the same volumes. Remember, the Windows way was the least efficient way --- it was so inefficient, it was looking like it would never complete.