Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:26:02 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <1WoqP.4088$NgFa.1524@fx46.iad> <6CIqP.4095$NgFa.688@fx46.iad> <67b07a28$0$29716$426a74cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:26:03 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="df6131520bdbbf4afb3d14a2a42a67bd"; logging-data="228222"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+yn7/GFXo8yR1n8103Na6p" User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6BW+i9oZ0bpfnCsRlpyhb+C+Bwk= Bytes: 2080 On 15 Feb 2025 11:27:36 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Nobody want to install something from source anymore. That’s why most distros offer prebuilt binaries. > If a developer offers his software for everyone he has to provide a way > to install a working binary with it. Nope. Just leave the building and packaging to the distro maintainers. That’s something they know how to do. >> The downside is that each SnapImage/FlatApp/whatever has to carry >> around all its dependencies with it, > > On a modern system, it's not an issue anymore. The idea that developers, particularly proprietary developers, can do a better job of keeping these dependencies up to date than the distro maintainers (whose job it is to do just that), just seems laughable.