Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 07:47:15 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <09103de9915b5ab3eb2105b832504d41e6119e14@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <b72490c1-e61a-4c23-a3a5-f624b2c084e4@att.net> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
 <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
 <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net> <vkp0fv$b7ki$2@dont-email.me>
 <b125beff-cb76-4e5a-b8b8-e4c57ff468e9@att.net> <vkr8j0$t59a$1@dont-email.me>
 <98519289-0542-40ce-886e-b50b401ef8cf@att.net> <vksicn$16oaq$7@dont-email.me>
 <8e95dfce-05e7-4d31-b8f0-43bede36dc9b@att.net> <vl1ckt$2b4hr$1@dont-email.me>
 <53d93728-3442-4198-be92-5c9abe8a0a72@att.net> <vl5tds$39tut$1@dont-email.me>
 <9c18a839-9ab4-4778-84f2-481c77444254@att.net> <vl87n4$3qnct$1@dont-email.me>
 <6db7afa9-f1e1-4d2b-beba-a5fc7a8b8686@att.net> <vl952v$3vk28$1@dont-email.me>
 <e97ca358-cc9c-4f6f-a93b-3459821fc4aa@att.net> <vl9ev9$1u2d$1@dont-email.me>
 <53806d5c-f456-4c13-8506-24c0b9ab310e@att.net> <vlas93$cr0l$1@dont-email.me>
 <545edcf1a7ba488b6324128c9e9ec2bc8be18677@i2pn2.org>
 <vldncm$vlah$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 12:47:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2128180"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vldncm$vlah$4@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2697
Lines: 24

On 1/5/25 5:37 AM, WM wrote:
> On 04.01.2025 14:17, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 1/4/25 3:42 AM, WM wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/3/2025 2:48 PM, WM wrote:
>>>>> On 03.01.2025 19:46, Jim Burns wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All finite.ordinals removed from
>>>> the set of each and only finite.ordinals
>>>> leaves the empty set.
>>>
>>> But removing every ordinal that you can define (and all its 
>>> predecessors) from ℕ leaves almost all ordinals in ℕ.∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ 
>>> {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo
>>>
>> And what keep you from "defining" the rest of the Natural Numbers.
> 
> Try it yourself. Then you will see it.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 

But I CAN define any of the Natual Numbers, the whole infinite set of them.

Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity.