Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tjoen Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email Subject: Re: Usenet Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:58:14 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: tjoen@dds.nl MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:58:16 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c960a8a325e46c50e63b64ca36748e3a"; logging-data="4145874"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+mg7yyX+OK4HPOA6XHn0h" User-Agent: Thunderbird Daily Cancel-Lock: sha1:B8i+f2dsJgnYJA7Yo0RMkX8DgC4= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1961 On 1/20/25 9:13 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote: > In article , tjoen wrote: >> On 1/20/25 4:59 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote: >> .. >>> And THEN of course there was this huge backlash started by Cyrus Vance, Jr. >>> who saw attacking it as a political tool. That pretty much put it to bed. >> >> Unknown this side of the ocean. >> Also not mentioned on his Wikipedia article > > I'm surprised it wasn't known there because it was such a huge deal on > Usenet at the time.... so many people lost Usenet access when almost all > of the major American ISPs dropped their Usenet service at once. Wikipedia Usenet article doesn't mention it either. Only mentions decline. linux advocacy group looks lively