Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Date: 13 Dec 2024 08:43:36 GMT Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <947j2lx3qf.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <24ffec92-9486-251d-7a42-d376b88b2c9b@example.net> <20241209135847.00004fb7@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net HpaWbDEqJ67dZf4D7j/4FAAyJfiF1YdlPGid4HqCkxpykl3v02 Cancel-Lock: sha1:fhXFB9gN6FORSwbqPDZTRakofTY= sha256:voqzuhRQs7GvothJ5hsh3IgZY+OmWQPI5mqTjpgmb74= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 1884 On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 04:37:50 -0000 (UTC), Rich wrote: > rbowman wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 01:54:05 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> Ummmmm ... I just TRIED with the "Bit-Slice" topic. >>> Jumped IMMEDIATELY back to 'non-OS/Computer stuff' >> >> How about that bubble memory? > > What I recall was all the hype about how bubble memory was going to > surpass everything else and the shift was "just around the corner". > > Thirty years later and few even remember "bubble memoriess" were ever a > thing. The memory hole is deep and dark. I think I still have the preliminary datasheets for the iAPX 432 that was going to be Intel's real 32 bit processor. The iAPX 86 was a stop gap until they got the bugs worked out.