Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!news.dfncis.de!not-for-mail From: Thomas Koenig Newsgroups: sci.physics.research Subject: Re: Newton's Gravity Date: 14 Jan 2025 08:06:07 GMT Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Approved: hees@itp.uni-frankfurt.de (sci.physics.research) Message-ID: References: X-Trace: news.dfncis.de 6nObixyuuO2JLwlu6UtLXQ7obPyzP71JJujPnJ/EpvIYUa6WVDmaIvBnTYVY8Kc1Bu Cancel-Lock: sha1:V5oSagia+kvze/0ppH3gHdG6gqM= sha256:SqymMy2kHBP/CcGeXpSnkfh3l6wJlEfdTVRVMhDaCuA= Bytes: 1827 Luigi Fortunati schrieb: > The consequence of all this is that the gravitational force of the > larger body of mass M acts on the entire mass of the smaller body > and this justifies the product m*M of Newton's formula, which > corresponds to the force exerted by the larger mass M on the entire > mass . > > Instead, the gravitational force of the smaller body of mass cannot > act on the entire body of mass M because M is larger That is a non sequitur if there ever was one. Why should this be the case? Think of a mass M as being divided into i smaller submasses (all with the same mass m_part) and of a mass j of being divided into m smaller submasses with the same mass m_part. Which submass of M should not interact all submasses of j?