Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: James Kuyper Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Python recompile Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 23:26:17 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com> <20250314113217.0000634b@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 04:26:17 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="574a59b4fab7f6890a5b81a9d0258b48"; logging-data="2731793"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194aq/IxrEYKHNgyAMGXeBk3qeMmxGIQD4=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:YXqsrweRdgwRl1xI4CzK4wKqJmU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2253 On 3/14/25 19:01, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:54:07 +0000, Richard Heathfield wrote: > >> Learn to snip! > > I do that, and then the other person claims that I snipped out something > important that made their point seem completely the opposite to what I > thought it was. > > Of course, they are never able to point to the part that was so > important ... I've occasionally made such a claim, but every time I've done so I identified the part that was missing. Often I've copied it into my response, but at a minimum I have always described the missing part is sufficient detail to uniquely identify it.