Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 14:52:10 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <vsoklq$3bkp2$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vrsc49$1gv1c$2@dont-email.me>
 <440ff556-a769-482e-ad2a-064af14c5781@att.net> <vrulap$3l4i0$2@dont-email.me>
 <369e62e9-93e6-4256-96ed-f9d8489aa017@att.net> <vrv307$3vgl7$4@dont-email.me>
 <5004d400-7c2e-4d59-ad66-5986a416ef89@att.net> <vrv9oe$8plq$3@dont-email.me>
 <411d5c64-ddb6-4655-a264-2149d054ff7d@att.net> <vs1hhj$2bn9k$1@dont-email.me>
 <vs1rsr$26e3$1@news.muc.de> <vs4bsi$eulg$7@solani.org>
 <vs4g95$18v5$1@news.muc.de> <vsjgap$1r7cv$4@dont-email.me>
 <vsmpmc$v6u$2@news.muc.de> <vsn028$1n28g$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsn041$1n28g$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:52:10 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="94aa90b48bb1a5a3bc8f08ad22f7ba71";
	logging-data="3527458"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19kpcTiBsPxDOUcmceVFlvV/RxnU0C+2RY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MljFlVuAbLiM0QradtPTLT2a9uw=
In-Reply-To: <vsn041$1n28g$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2104

On 03.04.2025 23:55, Moebius wrote:

> "It is not for nothing, after all, that set theorists resort to the 
> axiomatic method. Intuition here /is/ bankrupt." (W.V.O. Quine, Set 
> Theory and its Logic)

Logic is bankrupt in set theory. That has been unmasked by Burns' losses 
in lossless exchange.

Mathematics and Intuition recognize that addition of an element makes a 
set having more substance. Set theorists seriously claim that the set 
has not grown. That is not "counterintuitive" but simply brainless.

Regards, WM