Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 09:35:27 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <494bfd3b-3c70-4d8d-9c70-ce917c15fc22@att.net> <72142d82-0d71-460a-a1be-cadadf78c048@att.net> <812e64b1-c85c-48ac-a58c-e8955bc02f8c@att.net> <22b74adc-bf38-4aa4-a44f-622f0a2a5c41@att.net> <77a1069f5c5b8f95927ed9a33ecc6374c9d0a2dd@i2pn2.org> <20e517f6-d709-46fd-83f8-04c6b4fe9f59@tha.de> <4679319ea238a03fb042ae0c4de078c1a310c8a5@i2pn2.org> <21586c471d7da511d9a2bc75fb13ee29f30e4e66@i2pn2.org> <4db90e7b18a6b0eb12e2a52440b72981cfe5bd7e@i2pn2.org> <3fb45d17296a2480803d9ae57605b57028f7f697@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 09:35:27 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f29b607f7791c09fbf29348f2e168486"; logging-data="3755435"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18afeyIvHCKlpicetSHHU+WqWut29+4t78=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Wy/eUESKyY7XcxaBBa6Uk13LoCg= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <3fb45d17296a2480803d9ae57605b57028f7f697@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 2462 On 25.01.2025 14:09, joes wrote: > Am Sat, 25 Jan 2025 12:14:18 +0100 schrieb WM: >> ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo. >> To have infinitely many would require to use also the ℵo successors. > Why don't you use them? > They are outside of FISONs F(n) = {1, 2, 3, ..., n}. Note the universal quantifier in ∀n ∈ UF(n): |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo Regards, WM