Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:28:26 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e058b6093767bdd2d5704ae03ba89bfbcd19ba6f@i2pn2.org>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vqrn89$u9t$1@news.muc.de>
	<vqrp47$2gl70$1@dont-email.me> <vqrtn3$1uq5$1@news.muc.de>
	<vqs1og$2k7oh$2@dont-email.me> <vqsh1r$2cnf$1@news.muc.de>
	<vqsoq5$2p6pb$1@dont-email.me> <vqsuf0$2g64$1@news.muc.de>
	<vqucdi$36bb4$1@dont-email.me> <vqukqm$19g3$1@news.muc.de>
	<vqv0gq$3eapu$1@dont-email.me>
	<937c08656bbf0423daf3ef7524c87f15863cfdae@i2pn2.org>
	<vqv2c6$3eapv$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:28:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="131589"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1802
Lines: 14

Am Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:50:14 +0100 schrieb WM:
> On 13.03.2025 17:42, joes wrote:
>> Am Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:18:34 +0100 schrieb WM:
> 
>>> Above we have an inductive definition of all elements which have
>>> infinitely many dark successors.
>> They are not dark.
> Then subtract all definable numbers individually from ℕ with the same
> result as can be accomplished collectively:
> ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = { }.
Now what?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.