Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 13:29:55 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <7EKdnTIUz9UkpXL6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@brightview.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 12:29:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c289a35489489d88fb7cd6e10493bedd"; logging-data="828802"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ekLrrcxxN/vF+jbdOBGIa" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:05muwy6kn7W6Y5oqnXaP1tU/mjs= Bytes: 2027 On 2025-04-05 07:38:19 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro said: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 09:16:17 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote: > >> Since all elements (except your two openers) begin with a 3, none of >> them start 12, and so after just two iterations we have already >> constructed a number that's not in the infinite list. > > Remember that the hypothesis of the Cantor “proof” is that the list is > already supposed to contain every computable number. The fact that the > contruction succeeds for your list examples does not mean it will succeed > with mine. How can Cantor's construction fail to succeed on a list? -- Mikko