Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Brown Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Integral types and own type definitions (was Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:45:40 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <868qp1ra5f.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250319115550.0000676f@yahoo.com> <20250319201903.00005452@yahoo.com> <86r02roqdq.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86o6xpk8sn.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250325011327.41@kylheku.com> <20250325131110.000056bd@yahoo.com> <87a5987sh8.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <871puk7kae.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250326160142.000051a6@yahoo.com> <20250326171612.00000a8d@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:45:41 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9e00a15ae379d2cae7edd65ac25a9709"; logging-data="2252747"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19W6U+nKZj4HfqHHTThPW1PrLycKPa3oVU=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:dbMH3xd6PM1LxWp+Rc9SjPh9VT4= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <20250326171612.00000a8d@yahoo.com> Bytes: 2953 On 26/03/2025 16:16, Michael S wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:45:50 +0000 > Richard Heathfield wrote: > >> On 26/03/2025 14:01, Michael S wrote: >>> But your school in UK taught you the same meaning of 'whole >>> numbers' as James's school in US. >> >> What makes you think so? > > It seems, he said it himself in one of replies. Now I am doubting myself. Still, I am pretty sure that I didn't say anything like that, because I don't remember being taught about a definition of the term "whole numbers" at school at all. (I /do/ remember learning it from other sources while I was at school - I was the weird kid who read maths books in my spare time.) > >> Mine certainly didn't. > > But you are significantly older than David. Not sure about James. > It would have been around 1984 when I first learned about terms such as "the set of integers" in a rigorous manner.