Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers
 are wrong
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 16:22:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e7868f47c94b8edcc6fcf2b224e8ac5ea8a2fa7c@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq1qnr$q7t4$3@dont-email.me>
	<f0be934f2a26969e435b81050738f0960d4eb366@i2pn2.org>
	<vq1uqs$r6p7$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 16:22:03 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2480367"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1884
Lines: 20

Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 09:51:56 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/2/2025 8:55 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 08:42:03 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>> 
>>> I challenged everyone here to provide the machine address by machine
>>> address (AKA line by line) execution trace of DD correctly emulated by
>>> HHH that reaches its own "ret" instruction.
>>> No one made any attempt to do this because they know that this would
>>> prove that they are stupidly wrong to say that my trace is incorrect.
>> I did, on thursday at 9pm UTC.
>> 
> I am asking for a sequence of 10 hexadecimal integer machine addresses
> of DD correctly emulated by HHH.
See that post.

> At machine address 0000213c HHH emulates itself emulating DD. 
Yeah, it simulates HHH, not DD.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.