Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: 5 Fun Linux Commands You Should Try At Least Once Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 04:49:26 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <67ef0717@news.ausics.net> <67f26f8b$0$28481$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <67fa3eb4$0$11423$426a34cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 06:49:35 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5a394981b73e49d36ebf2736a3771422"; logging-data="2254412"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+19nNK7HitsuVXSB/gKK/o" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:RhTGpTUVa6yjZDoX01tqYoTG+JE= Bytes: 1518 On 12 Apr 2025 10:21:40 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > For me, it's easier to avoid accident by giving the name of the program > I want to stop to killall, than by giving the number of the process to > kill. Trouble is, it’s not less error-prone.