Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: III correctly emulated by EEE ---
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 07:04:30 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <cdd3666c57ec89aa553647c5c5fd69945d016e86@i2pn2.org>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vrmua7$cvat$8@dont-email.me>
 <dc633a07cd15e2c80ed98083cc5f9d218edcc9da@i2pn2.org>
 <vro0hk$1c9ia$1@dont-email.me>
 <9adf9b9c30250aaa2d3142509036c892db2b7096@i2pn2.org>
 <vrpfua$2qbhf$2@dont-email.me>
 <211f9a2a284cb2deaa666f424c1ef826fe855e80@i2pn2.org>
 <vrq330$3dq3n$1@dont-email.me>
 <e7268e8ef47579cacb49b0533d51549a77eb0b96@i2pn2.org>
 <vrqb6f$3k9kh$2@dont-email.me>
 <3f250e699762cfe6fccc844f10eb04f32d470b6a@i2pn2.org>
 <vrrpcl$11a56$4@dont-email.me>
 <8423998561d8feee807509b0ed6335123d35a7c9@i2pn2.org>
 <vru6in$38ob9$3@dont-email.me>
 <a81b9021e9b676c568d12f8e9fa9d27a0e7f4c07@i2pn2.org>
 <vrvs8b$p4vd$1@dont-email.me>
 <b4513778f4d273817c0b3f5bf20955e6e23aab0f@i2pn2.org>
 <vs20o1$2ot1m$2@dont-email.me>
 <803bd062b0eb7345e153adbb3b76eea1a0307a18@i2pn2.org>
 <vs29v1$31ibk$2@dont-email.me>
 <1fe49b2f2605ae8ab4e3127ad89e19952004e7de@i2pn2.org>
 <vs2dlm$354gv$1@dont-email.me>
 <b6e8903b39920fc927156a241708075095241088@i2pn2.org>
 <vs2iq3$38lvq$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:04:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1963156"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vs2iq3$38lvq$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3547
Lines: 51

On 3/27/25 12:05 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 3/26/2025 10:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 3/26/25 10:37 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/26/2025 9:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 3/26/25 9:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 3/26/2025 8:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/26/25 6:57 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/26/2025 6:24 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since none of your EEE shows the actual behavior of the input, 
>>>>>>>> and we can show that since EEE will ALWAYS return after a finite 
>>>>>>>> number of steps 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> III emulated by EEE never reaches its final halt state.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only because EEE doesn't do a complete emulation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How is an infinite number of steps not a complete emulation?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You EEE never did an infinite numbdr of steps.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Because you continue to dishonestly dodge the point I
>>> have to revise the point to shut down your dishonest dodge.
>>>
>>> How is an infinite number of steps not a complete emulation?
>>>
>>
>> Because you defined EEE to do a finite number of steps?
>>
> 
> I just redefined it to be infinite dipshit.

Glad you are admitting that you "logic" is just "infinite dipshit".

That is how all your logic works, you can't hold yourself to a single 
definition, because you logic just can't work.

Sorry, you are proving that you are nothing but a pathological liar, and 
that all your work is just a FRAUD.

> 
>> How is a finite number of steps ever infinite?
>>
>> You just are proving you don't understand the meaning of the words you 
>> use.
> 
>