Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most? Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 09:29:37 +0000 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <87v7swzzl7.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <87a5a7k0ko.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <8734fzozd2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250228141947.000056b8@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 10:29:37 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="466d76f997a1f90e214f6b0baca6a13f"; logging-data="768770"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QHcGzRJYmUYVeT0tseLn5GSXyya8Pu0ZjPDpcXhbh6Q==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:VrQpL0g87FkGRN6/ukur3P78kxM= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <20250228141947.000056b8@yahoo.com> Bytes: 2150 On 28/02/2025 12:19, Michael S wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:24:19 +0000 > Richard Heathfield wrote: > >> On 28/02/2025 09:22, David Brown wrote: >>> >>> As long as it's not "Long time no C" :-) >> >> I'm afraid it is. Nowadays I spend most of my time arguing with >> \LaTeX, although when I do cut code it is in C (and that's proper >> C, of course, not this newfangled gibberish). >> > > one man's newfangled gibberish is another man's proper C Agreed. On the other hand, it is easy to overlook the virtue of stability, and change does not necessarily imply progress. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within