Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bart Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Python recompile Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 21:47:34 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 22:47:34 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="47e797ced630f80c5bb39c6721543ec4"; logging-data="2194970"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+Rzzlvydry2hUIzIQmIjI" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PaW3MoGhccshBx67VZ8ZGWrGlbo= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2666 On 14/03/2025 21:35, Richard Harnden wrote: > On 14/03/2025 21:15, bart wrote: >> On 14/03/2025 19:37, Richard Harnden wrote: >>> On 14/03/2025 19:04, bart wrote: >>>> After all no one (according to you) was complaining about grappling >>>> with 100 discrete files. >>> >>> 100 discrete files helps 100 developers not to step on each other's >>> toes. >>> >>> And most of those 100 .o's won't need to be recompiled on every make. >>> It's quicker and easier. >>> >> >> That may be true about the people who /develop/ this sqlite3 product. >> >> But this is a file created to ease deployment by people who want to / >> use/ it. > > This is a newsgroup populated by developers. Yes, but in this example, they're developers working on their own product, who want to incorporate somebody else's project as source code. Then 1 or 2 files will be hell of a lot easier than 100 files in some arbitrary directory tree. > Users won't be going anywhere near a compiler - they'll get shipped the > binary. Why not? Apparently all they have to is type 'make'.