Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Python recompile Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 22:50:56 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <20250304092827.708@kylheku.com> <871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com> <20250309012626.00001276@yahoo.com> <20250309112807.0000489d@yahoo.com> <20250310152000.00004955@yahoo.com> <20250310144539.321@kylheku.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 06:51:03 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="af44222198935e88df6749dd19756219"; logging-data="3265836"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+d5xbH3NlYFx3V15y+UzIcJKQCiqWnv4c=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:xWt4slWLRi7XVL7jUcbnR0bYiTQ= In-Reply-To: <20250310144539.321@kylheku.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3190 On 3/10/2025 2:55 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > On 2025-03-10, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 3/10/2025 2:36 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:20:00 +0200, Michael S wrote: >>> >>>> Similar to poll(), yes. Not so similar to super-ugly select(). I >>>> hope that Unix people stopped using select in new programs two or >>>> more decades ago. >>> >>> Seems like WaitForMultipleObjects is more similar to select() than >>> poll(), though: it has a fixed limit (MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS) on the >>> number of objects you can wait on at once. >>> >>>> But WaitForMultipleObjects can do things that poll can not, like >>>> waiting on semaphore or on event or on thread (for completion, which >>>> POSIX people, in their eternal fondness for idiotic names call >>>> 'join'). >> >> [...] >> >> For some damn reason I am remembering that the array that >> WaitForMultipleObjects waits on should be "shifted" or even randomized >> per call in a server loop that is using EVENTS. IIRC, this was way back >> in late 90's and early 2000's. > > You remember correctly. I remember coding this. [...] I tried to email you back but it got kicked back.