Path: ...!news.nobody.at!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Andy Burns Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: gnome-remote vs vnc clients Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:55:38 +0100 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net EPCyO4MYM3c5jS1xk5+vYwnhHFxpo1w9Er0LU38G2k2N72n95P Cancel-Lock: sha1:cT93O5dJ9v83J774nw1F/H+u85o= sha256:BY5xtZu4FesNjVSL5/O/Ylzpf/TEZkTSipxVN1C5yv8= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1761 Pancho wrote: > Reading a bit, it is actually FreeRDP, which lists Gnome 42 as the first > version offering support. > > Centos is dead, isn't it? I think you need to move to a newer distro. That's why I said centos'ish I'm actually using Alma, there's also Rocky. >> Alternatively Ubuntu LTS 25.04 later this week? > > Surely moving to Debian is a bigger step than a new Red Hat distro. I > like my comfy slippers as much as the next old man, but even I will > switch between Debian distros. I've used Ubuntu where I "have" to, but I feel slightly fish out-of-water compared to something redhat'ish. I'll check how RDP works using a test Fedora VM. > whenever I've tried VNC, it has been shit. That's > why I used TeamViewer and then NoMachine. Yeah, you need to bear in mind the foibles of VNC clients, but they're usually usable.