Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 08:06:08 GMT Organization: Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien Lines: 13 Message-ID: <2025Mar3.090608@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> References: <2025Mar1.125817@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2025Mar1.232526@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2025Mar2.234011@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:08:21 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="02abba070423f036a0c54aba275aea87"; logging-data="1318641"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/R9POwr/wIGXM7ZaZjTpfh" Cancel-Lock: sha1:03N/zlABoxMQ4Q+brNk0IIR+FV4= X-newsreader: xrn 10.11 Bytes: 1624 Thomas Koenig writes: >The VAX is still supported with gcc and binutils, with newlib as >its C library, so building up a tool chain for assembly/disassembly >should be doable with a few (CPU) hours; you can then compare >sizes. Good. While the CPU hours are not the problem, I cannot spare the human hours for such a project. - anton -- 'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.' Mitch Alsup,