Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { }
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:07:56 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <86r01yaaoj.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <vsph6b$ce6m$5@dont-email.me> <86ldsdfocs.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250406161323.00005809@yahoo.com> <86ecy5fjin.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250406190321.000001dc@yahoo.com> <86plhodtsw.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250407210248.00006457@yahoo.com> <vt15lq$bjs0$3@dont-email.me> <vt2lp6$1qtjd$1@dont-email.me> <vt31m5$2513i$1@dont-email.me> <vt3d4g$2djqe$1@dont-email.me> <vt3iqh$2ka99$1@dont-email.me> <868qoaeezc.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt3oeo$2oq3p$1@dont-email.me> <86mscqcpy1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt48go$35hh3$2@dont-email.me> <86iknecjz8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt4del$3a9sk$1@dont-email.me> <86o6x5at05.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt712u$1m84p$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 19:07:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="71ab0539a1cf710e3caa6c34edacc1d7";
	logging-data="2122660"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9tqnLh/BICuuNIibNeuAvgFBM69wxEhk="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3XeTt9sWFP1L0D2pMLEx4kDVUaI=
	sha1:sC/ztTVPku6sR1sbRE5K0VMg/ao=
Bytes: 2917

bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

> On 09/04/2025 23:07, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>
>> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 09/04/2025 00:27, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>>>
>>>> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>> If you want to make a point or ask a question about C code,
>>>>>> SHOW THE CODE.  And show all of it.  Don't make people guess by
>>>>>> showing only some of the code or by giving just a description.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm showing the code but you keep snipping it!  [...]
>>>>
>>>> No, I don't.  Don't be so obtuse.  I included the code I was
>>>> originally commenting on, in my first followup.  My comment about
>>>> showing code was about your second posting.  Let me repeat the
>>>> two important paragraphs (quoted above) taken from that posting:
>>>>
>>>>>>> I get an incompatible error (from the example you snipped)
>>>>>>> even when I remove both struct tags.
>>>>
>>>> The phrase "even when I remove both struct tags" describes code, it
>>>> doesn't show the code.
>>>
>>> I showed this example a few lines later [in an earlier posting]
>>> which has both struct tags omitted:
>>
>> There is a simple lesson that you need to learn:
>
> Please don't be patronising.  We are not kids in your PL class.

I'm sorry you feel that way.  I was trying to be helpful.