Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::5!not-for-mail
From: Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Names of ancient computing devices [was:  Re: The joy of FORTRAN]
Date: 09 Mar 2025 21:50:29 -0400
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 19
Sender: alderson+news@panix5.panix.com
Message-ID: <mddcyepvel6.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
References: <59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad> <vqej5u$3g9rk$1@dont-email.me> <Uwmdndf9UpxESFf6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mddv7skl9hy.fsf_-_@panix5.panix.com> <m31dl2FplhqU1@mid.individual.net> <mddbjubgn1z.fsf@panix5.panix.com> <XFjzP.18957$Sfe6.797@fx35.iad>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::5";
	logging-data="5412"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 22.3
Bytes: 1620

Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes:

> On 2025-03-08, Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> wrote:

  [ snip ]

>> In one of his essays, Asimov explained that he made the same error to which
>> I was responding above, that UniVac was a device with *one* *vacuum* *tube*,
>> so that he called the computer in his story "MultiVac".

> No, he called it "Multivac".  CamelCasing had yet to be invented at the time.

Well played.

-- 
Rich Alderson					  news@alderson.users.panix.com
      Audendum est, et veritas investiganda; quam etiamsi non assequamur,
	  omnino tamen proprius, quam nunc sumus, ad eam perveniemus.
									--Galen