Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 06:38:04 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Theory determines what we observe. --Albert Einstein
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
References: <68049149.3982@ix.netcom.com> <1rb3qin.q8hf354phnshN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <vu3gvb$9leb$2@solani.org> <1838419b56cd2c18$1565359$1494137$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <vu61e2$asln$3@solani.org> <183868af60f186ae$1582025$1488192$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <vu64qk$asln$7@solani.org> <18386b25d8c7741e$902784$1498207$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <vu66kf$asln$9@solani.org> <18386d66488e87f9$974940$1498207$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <vu6ii5$av57$1@solani.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vu6ii5$av57$1@solani.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 62
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 04:38:05 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2821
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <18388a168c40c541$1885966$1494137$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3187

On 4/22/2025 12:58 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 > On 4/21/25 2:52 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
 >> On 4/21/2025 9:34 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 >>> On 4/21/25 2:11 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
 >>>> On 4/21/2025 9:03 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 >>>>> On 4/21/25 1:25 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
 >>>>>> On 4/21/2025 8:05 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 >>>>>>> On 4/21/25 1:29 AM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
 >>>>>>>> On 4/20/2025 9:12 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 >>>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>>  >> Werner Heisenberg said, "We have to remember that what we 
observe is not
 >>>>>>>>  >> nature in itself but nature exposed to our method of 
questioning."
 >>>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>> What we observe - is a claim. It's
 >>>>>>>> a text information. It submits our
 >>>>>>>> rules of text processing, nature
 >>>>>>>> "in itself"  has nothing to do with
 >>>>>>>> it and never had.
 >>>>>>>> And, yes - a theory teaches us how
 >>>>>>>> our observation should look like.
 >>>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>> "Text information" is nature in itself, Bozo.
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> No it is not. Without a trained by a culture
 >>>>>> human mind able to interprete it it's either
 >>>>>> a stream of meaningless sounds or a stream
 >>>>>> of meaningless characters, Bozo.
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>> "a stream of meaningless sounds" is nature in itself, Bozo.
 >>>>
 >>>> But a text isn't that.
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Anything that is, is nature in itself, Bozo.
 >>
 >> No, Bozo.
 >> https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/nature
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >
 >
 > There is a difference between the English language and physics, Bozo.

Yes, physicists are too stupid to deal
with the communication protocols of sane
people. So are wannabe  physicists, Bozo.