Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: How do nonroot Android & nonjailbroken iOS run SMB servers to connect to each other & Windows? Date: 26 Apr 2025 04:23:02 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: <0rljdlx76o.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net mhWAAG7xsPNUVvAe7p0lIg2kv3fqaNvoUYWzIfhYNLFlp5i1PD Cancel-Lock: sha1:rDPhUxIsgBtdpvYDlmhZDcr3Hbs= sha256:pH8jwZak1/IYgbT/+37swm67eAXDXirjj6XxAyGyIKQ= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Bytes: 3492 On 2025-04-26, Alan wrote: > On 2025-04-25 11:11, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2025-04-25 17:33, Arno Welzel wrote: >>> Frank Slootweg, 2025-04-25 17:13: >>> >>>> Tyrone wrote: >>>>> On Apr 24, 2025 at 1:02:33?PM EDT, "Arno Welzel" >>>>> wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>>> Correct - iOS also does not allow using ports below 1024 for *servers* >>>>>> implemented in user installable apps without privileged access. >>>>> >>>>> Oh look.  Arlen has Y.A.S.P.  That's so cute. >>>> >>>>    Arno Welzel isn't 'Arlen'. As Chris also mentioned, Arno came (too) >>>> late to the thread and apparently has not been following the thread, so >>>> he was not aware that iOS *can* use servers on ports below 1024. >>>> >>>>    AFAICT from the comments from You Guys (TM), Arno's comment on "user >>>> installable apps" is incorrect, because AFAIK the iOS SMB server used >>>> ('LAN Drive Samba server') *is* an user-installable app. Correct? >>>> What about his "apps without privileged access" comment? >>> >>> I stand corrected, if iOS allows user installable apps without any >>> special permission using ports below 1024 as server. I was just not >>> aware of that and did not expect this, since Android does not allow that >>> like any Linux based systems. But iOS is not Linux based and of course >>> it may be that Apple decided to handle that in a different way. >> >> iOS an unixoid system inside. It is based on Darwin, which is an open- >> source Unix-like operating system developed by Apple. It should have the >> same limitation binding to ports below 1024 for user apps. That it >> doesn't is interesting. > > Not really. > > It's not like the restriction on "privileged ports" is baked into the > kernel... > > ...and even if it were, it could be unbaked. Exactly. It's really not the big deal they think it is. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR