Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: 7 Oct 2024 03:02:55 GMT Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <36KdnVlGJu9VLW77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net KsLwq6cIalgczHUxlGa7zgcAKuOeonkY0a7azlIAebYCA5odSd Cancel-Lock: sha1:z6wbS5uwu496LfhFAVNREUiI/4s= sha256:xrIuCpwPFvputdpgIwiCU4LcVaIzhLtyfIBuF9cP+YE= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 1825 On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 16:06:14 -0600, Louis Krupp wrote: > GNU Forth... I don't know enough about it to have an opinion. https://gforth.org/manual/Forth-is-written-in-Forth.html Forth is an odd beast. There is a very small engine that has to be built for the processor in question to handle words. https://github.com/forthy42/gforth/tree/master/engine gcc can handle that since it is C code.