Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Rewriting SSA. Is This A Chance For GNU/Linux? Date: 1 Apr 2025 17:35:11 GMT Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net pWRvm9Bv4oNld//NJrw4tA8ZFnEDL1HJkp8LaUR7FuKVY80Bta Cancel-Lock: sha1:BQkgnL0hQeMWQO0zDIP/OQlPt4U= sha256:ljleuImLpM1OPbUhIz5xsfpxYeGk7PqwTh/6c1D+Xf0= User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Bytes: 1632 On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:40:27 -0000 (UTC), Robert Heller wrote: > It should be noted that GnuCOBOL actually translates COBOL to C, and > then compiles the C code with GnuC. In *theory* one could just run the > whole code base through GnuCOBOL and create a C code base, but good luck > making much sense of the generated C code... I never did it with COBOL but I did use 'f2c' to generate C code from Fortran. When I saw the results I wrote the C code manually. It probably would have compiled and ran but it was not maintainable. I've seen more readable output from disassemblers.