Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: 28 Feb 2025 02:34:52 GMT Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <971448126.749088380.092448.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad> <3hOdnWpQ649QMGr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <1smdnSjX3YoxgWf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <1396870532.749421730.052473.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <1214951717.762291306.657281.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net pp4qranf8LAPe8/bGV5AOQKhZqDR5Z68e1aRlWYqXYLFr96zqk Cancel-Lock: sha1:WhZNtJAQylME7Ev4ITc4WurgxO0= sha256:r3ku4cqwwIEFTzXzEcTBNq67jCJQgJ8aefLT1kOUzu0= User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Bytes: 2363 On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:43:51 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > When all you had was Macro assembler, writing a good library of Macros > gave you almost a high level language, except it wasn't portable. > > C *was* portable, mostly. > > And it was faster to write than Macros assembler. It was really a no > brainer. Sadly, macros made their way into C. The basic idea was fine but we had one programmer who laid awake nights thinking up new perverted things to do with macros. I forget if it was Kernighan or Ritchie who later said if they had only known what people would do with them... C++ doubled down with inline functions.