Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::5!not-for-mail
From: Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN
Date: 26 Feb 2025 19:43:38 -0500
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 18
Sender: alderson+news@panix5.panix.com
Message-ID: <mddikow8bet.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <1smdnSjX3YoxgWf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <llv30aFa6uvU3@mid.individual.net> <vde4b8$268qv$22@dont-email.me> <1396870532.749421730.052473.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <wrapper-20241001111737@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <vpl5uk$hhk$3@reader1.panix.com> <vpl91g$25q46$1@dont-email.me> <1976765442.762208809.808387.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <20250225130315.00004e34@gmail.com> <lhqvP.1323465$if26.592741@fx13.iad> <20250225132209.00006cdd@gmail.com> <1517019530.762216070.153616.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <vpli68$26ur1$6@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::5";
	logging-data="17484"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 22.3
Bytes: 2060

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

> I wonder why DEC's 18-bit range weren't more popular; though I think they had
> less consistency between members of the range than DEC's other product
> families.

You're once again demonstrating that you don't really know what you're talking
about.

The PDP-1 was indeed a different architecture from the other 18 bit family, but
the PDP-4 was a subset of the PDP-7 was a subset of the PDP-9 was a subset of
the PDP-15.  That's pretty fucking consistent to my way of thinking...

-- 
Rich Alderson					  news@alderson.users.panix.com
      Audendum est, et veritas investiganda; quam etiamsi non assequamur,
	  omnino tamen proprius, quam nunc sumus, ad eam perveniemus.
									--Galen