Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: sms Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: Apple tacitly admits their CPUs and new Modem are merely a marketing gimmick Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 12:30:53 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <76c59e31ac44677e6484fba540ef2ad7a65fb9ec@i2pn2.org> Reply-To: scharf.steven@geemail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 21:30:54 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="845a5882acb4f7167b1399dff4cbc3c4"; logging-data="3294568"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18NvaU905TXE9vy4W4mY3QH" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:qATPiNN1jojVmGrgQXSUol4003I= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2221 On 2/22/2025 3:38 AM, -hh wrote: > In any event, there's more things than just geekery to criticize the new > iPhone 16E about.  Since the Apple modem is to not pay Qualcomm's high > chip licensing costs, then why did the price jump up by so much?  For > the $170 increase from $429 to $599 is a whopping +40%.  Tariffs? It's a certainty that the pricing reflected careful research of what the believed would generate optimal profit. If they are wrong, they can lower the price to $499 or $459, or whatever. The 16e is going to be purchased by a lot of corporations that provide iPhones to their employees, and that see the $599 price as a good deal because previously they were not forcing employees to take the SE, with the smaller screen, and were paying more than $599 (or whatever corporate price they negotiated). At my wife's company, a lot of her colleagues took the SE despite being allowed to take a larger screen model.