Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rolf Mantel Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Helmet efficacy test Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:56:23 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:56:23 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7b58b7d3d4dd52b0259d6c7bcc6ab210"; logging-data="2495945"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18pB/gWmRl/n3JDDr+ISEeb" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ivl4il0Zb+qynTZC8+d7vhG05ps= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1956 Am 19.04.2025 um 11:49 schrieb Catrike Ryder: > The significance was that every state vote count swung towards the > GOP, and that the popular vote was also for the GOP. That was a > significant swing towards the GOP in spite of the playing down by the > Democrats. "Significant swing" is correct. "Significant majority" is not. If you were behind in the past you often need a significant swing to get a very small majority.