Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:48:43 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <1irOP.851750$d51.585824@fx46.iad> <680df502$0$5208$426a74cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 04:48:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d04df55da68728393ee325291935b1e7"; logging-data="850091"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18P4Oug71nZg6HG5uS43Vq0" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:W+5s64mOyjTPZ+c+qrZMyYDOYCg= Bytes: 1936 On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:51:17 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote: > When the "auto" keyword was added to C++11, it could have created a > problem for legacy code which used 'auto' in a different context. The > committee checked a lot of code to see whether it would cause an issue > and determined it wouldn't break code. This is how responsible adults > work. Why not give us an example of responsible adulthood in action, by showing us how you would fix up X11 to prolong its life a bit further?